Choosing winning product lines and getting them into the hands of customers is an art that, when practiced well, makes good merchants great. The last few years, there’s been a rush by manufacturers to get their green innovations to market. Many are going to be clear winners and will make a difference in transforming the built environment. Unfortunately, along with the rush has been the slapdash - products presented as earning LEED credits, or being less toxic, or ecologically benign, when they are not. Whether by deliberate deception or honest mistake, green washing has created confusion and skepticism in the market.
It’s not so easy to pick green winners, but there are practical steps that merchandisers can take to reliably evaluate the green-worthiness of any product. In general, the goal is to identify merchandise that meets certain criteria, both yours and your customers’. There are a variety of product certifications and, of course, LEED and other green building rating systems provide relatively clear criteria. But there is no master green products list to go by, and no matter how comprehensive, certifications and building rating systems are not going to cover all the product categories stocked in most stores and yards.
But if you’re willing to roll up your sleeves and “green it yourself”, there’s another way to look at whether the merchandise you choose to sell is green worthy. Start by asking: Does it harm or benefit the environment? Does it pose health risks or promote healthy lifestyles? Are communities positively or negatively affected in its manufacture? Does it work? Will it sell? These questions should take in the entire lifecycle of the product, which includes looking at the impacts relating to raw materials, manufacturing process, distribution, use and disposal.
The broad categories addressing human health and safety, ecological safety, and social responsibility provide the background for more specific product criteria and attributes – a partial list:
- Energy – products that conserve energy, produce renewable energy or are made from renewable energy sources.
- Water – products that conserve water usage, especially the use of fresh, potable water, also product alternatives that don’t pollute water sources or aquatic eco-systems.
- Toxic chemicals – products that are made with non-toxic or least toxic, low risk chemicals and other components.
- Healthy and sustainable practices – products that contribute to healthy and sustainable practices, such as rainwater harvesting, composting, etc.
The evaluation process starts with the manufacturer who should provide credible product information, preferably with third-party documentation supporting their green claims. That may not be enough. Consult with independent experts and review third-party information on the internet, too. There are several helpful databases online that will show what’s known about specific chemicals. Comparing products in the same category will help to identify the “greenest” in class. Finally, there must be a judgment about whether or not the product does the job and will sell – get a sample, take it for a test spin.
If the green merchandiser is defined by product selection, he or she is also defined by products not selected. There are plenty of useful products for which there may be better or greener options. But there are also junk products for which the only “green” option is that they simply not exist. Every dealer in this supply chain has experience with junk, if only by accident. These are products so poorly designed, manufactured so cheaply, and are so obviously heading straight for the landfill that they cannot be justified no matter how low the price point. Eliminating the worst junk from inventory is not only practical, it’s also a virtuous step toward sustainability.
Posts
